The Federal Government says it has identified seven alleged discrepancies in the leaked report of the Lagos State Judicial Panel of Inquiry and Restitution to Investigate Cases of Police Brutality.
Speaking at a press conference on Tuesday, Nigeria’s Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, said some of the inconsistencies in the report cannot be ignored.
The minister described the report of the panel as fake news and a hoax created to vilify the federal government, saying that the report in circulation cannot be relied upon because its authenticity is in doubt
He, however, listed the loopholes in the report as below:
1. BALLISTIC REPORTS
Mohammed stated: “The report threw away the testimony of ballistic experts who testified before it. The experts said, inter alia, in their testimony: ”The Team finds that from the medical data examined, including the timeline of arrival at a medical facility and the nature of the injuries sustained by the victims, who were taken to the 5 medical facilities, that no military grade live ammunition (high-velocity) was fired at the protesters at Lekki Tollgate on 20th October 2020, within the timeframe of reference (18.30- 20.34hrs).
“That the GSW (Gun Shot Wounds) injuries (4 in number between 19:05 and 19:45 hrs), which were
examined by the Team, can be safely identified as being discharged by either low-velocity calibre and/or artisanal/12-gauge firearms (artisanal firearms are locally-fabricated weapons). What is however certain is that had the military personnel deliberately fired military-grade live ammunition directly at the protesters; there would have been significantly more fatalities and catastrophic injuries recorded. This was clearly not the case.”
Mohammed said: “The same panel that said it deemed as credible the evidence of the Forensic Pathologist, Prof. John Obafun
3. VICTIM TESTIMONY
He submitted: “The man whose evidence (that he counted 11 bodies in a military van where he was left for dead before he escaped) was found to be crucial by the panel never testified in person. Rather, the video of his ‘testimony’ was played by someone else. It did not occur to the panel to query the veracity of the testimony of a man who said he was shot and presumed dead but still had time to count dead bodies inside a supposedly dark van at night!”
4. BLOODSTAINS AND BULLET CASINGS
The minister said: “The panel said trucks with brushes underneath were brought to the Lekki Toll Gate in the morning of Oct. 21, 2020, to clean up bloodstains and other evidence, but still found bullet casings at the same site when it visited on Oct. 30th 2020. It said soldiers picked up bullet casings from Lekki Toll Gate on the night of Oct. 20th 2020, yet claimed that policemen came to the same spot to pick the same bullet casings on Oct. 21st 2020!”
5. FAMILIES OF THE VICTIMS
Mohammed submitted: “The panel was silent on the family members of those reportedly killed, merely insinuating they were afraid to testify. Even goats have owners who will look for them if they do not return home, not to talk of human beings. Where are the family members of those who were reportedly killed at Lekki Toll Gate?”
“If the panel is recommending compensation for the families, what are their identities and addresses? Who will receive the compensations when no family members have shown up to date?”
6. VICTIM LIST/MASSACRE
“How can a Judicial Panel convince anyone that the names of some casualties of the Lekki Toll Gate incident listed as numbers 3 (Jide), 42 (Tola) and 43 (Wisdom) are not fictitious names.?”
“Why did the Judicial Panel feel compelled to concoct a ”massacre in context” as a euphemism for ”massacre”? A massacre is a massacre. What is ”massacre in context?” he queried.
7. DESTROYED BUSINESSES
The minister queried: “The report didn’t make any recommendation on the innocent people whose businesses were attacked and destroyed during the protest in Lagos. I think it was too busy looking for evidence to support its conclusion of ‘massacre in context.”